Phantom Stock vs. SARs: A Guide to Employee Incentives Without Equity Dilution
Let's talk equity compensation! Instead of issuing regular company stock, which can lead to loss of control, complex compliance, and dilution of...
6 min read
LegalGPS : Oct. 16, 2024
This guide will walk you through two common ways to issue stock to your employees: direct stock grants and direct stock purchase plans. We’ll explore how these forms of equity compensation work, their advantages and disadvantages, actionable steps to set them up, and real-world examples to make these concepts easier to understand.
Legal GPS Pro
Protect your business with our complete legal subscription service, designed by top startup attorneys.
A direct stock grant allows employees to acquire shares of company stock directly, often at minimal or no cost, as a reward for their ongoing contributions. Typically, only key employees or management are offered these grants, and they receive the same rights as any other shareholder.
Unlike other equity compensation options, direct stock grants do not have vesting restrictions. This means employees acquire ownership of the company stock immediately, without having to wait. In contrast, stock options often require employees to purchase shares over time at a fixed price.
Example: Imagine a startup called TechNova. To reward a key software developer for their contributions, TechNova offers a direct stock grant of 1,000 shares. The developer immediately owns these shares, allowing them to participate in shareholder meetings and benefit from any appreciation in company value.
No Broker Fees: Employees purchase shares directly from the company, which means they don't need to pay broker commissions.
Example: By avoiding brokers, a senior manager at GreenTech saves around $500 in commissions when acquiring shares through a direct stock grant.
Simple Valuation: Direct stock valuation is straightforward. Since it doesn't depend on stock price fluctuations like other forms of equity compensation (e.g., stock options), it's easier to assess the value for financial purposes.
Example: At BrightStart Inc., the HR team finds it much easier to calculate the value of direct stock grants compared to stock options, which are subject to market volatility.
Potential for Future Gains: Employees can convert direct stock to common stock, benefiting from future increases in value without significant risk.
Example: A project manager at SolarEdge receives direct stock, which later appreciates in value after a successful product launch, giving them a substantial financial gain.
Upfront Payment Required: Employees must use their own funds to cover the full value of the stock. Unlike Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs), where employees can pay gradually through payroll deductions, direct stock grants require the full payment upfront.
Example: At FinServe Corp., an employee who wants to acquire 500 shares through a direct stock grant must pay $10,000 upfront, which can be a significant financial burden.
Uncertain Tax Consequences: Converting restricted stock to common stock may have uncertain tax implications, as there are no definitive regulations covering all scenarios.
Example: A marketing executive at InnovateX converts their restricted stock to common stock but faces confusion regarding whether the conversion will be taxed as ordinary income or treated as tax-free.
Attract Top Talent With Startup Equity
Creating a direct stock plan involves several stakeholders and steps. The human resources department typically takes the lead in designing the plan, with input from the legal team and board of directors. Here are the key participants:
HR Department: Responsible for creating the overall design of the plan.
Legal Department: Drafts the legal documents and ensures compliance with regulations.
Board of Directors: Approves the plan and any subsequent amendments.
Shareholders: May need to approve the plan, depending on state requirements.
When designing the plan, the board can make changes, suspend, or even terminate it by passing formal resolutions. Important provisions should include eligibility requirements, purchase timelines (e.g., 10-30 days to buy from the grant date), and clawback policies in case company goals are missed or errors occur.
Example: At EcoGrow Inc., the HR department collaborates with the legal team to draft a direct stock plan. The plan is then reviewed by the board of directors, who make amendments before final approval. The plan includes a 30-day window for employees to purchase shares after receiving a grant.
There are several ways employees can pay for their stock:
Out-of-Pocket Payment: Employees can pay the full amount using their own funds.
Example: A senior engineer at BuildTech chooses to pay $5,000 out of pocket to acquire 200 shares through a direct stock grant.
Non-Recourse Loan: The company can offer a non-recourse loan, where the employee's collateral (such as the stock itself) is used as repayment if they default.
Example: At HealthCore, employees are offered non-recourse loans to purchase stock. If an employee defaults, the company takes back the shares without pursuing further compensation.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan: Employees can reinvest their dividends to buy more company shares, but they must already hold at least one share to participate.
Example: An employee at PowerGen holds 100 shares and opts to reinvest their quarterly dividends to gradually increase their stock ownership.
Legal GPS Pro
Protect your business with our complete legal subscription service, designed by top startup attorneys.
Determining the value of the stock is crucial to designing an effective direct stock plan. Valuation affects how much stock an employee receives and what they must pay for it. There are several methods:
Enterprise Value: This is the estimated market value of the company, often used for mergers and acquisitions. It includes all cash and assets, less liabilities and preferred stock. Discounts for lack of marketability or control are applied since employees usually receive minority shares.
Example: At TechFusion, the enterprise value is calculated to determine the price for direct stock grants. Since employees are receiving minority shares, a 20% discount is applied.
Book Value: This valuation method uses financial records to determine the company's worth. It’s often used to set the purchase price for direct stock grants. However, it may make executives hesitant to take necessary risks that could lower the book value.
Example: At SafeHome Inc., the book value is used to determine the price of direct stock for employees. The company’s conservative approach to investments ensures a stable book value, which benefits employees receiving stock grants.
ESOP Fair Market Value: In cases with an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), the fair market value of shares is determined, usually incorporating discounts for lack of marketability and control. ESOPs offer tax advantages to both employers and employees.
Example: At AgriGrowth, an ESOP is used to value direct stock grants. Employees receive a discount on the fair market value, making it an attractive option for long-term wealth building.
EBITDA Method: The board of directors may also use the company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to determine the stock price. This approach helps establish the value without the need for an ESOP.
Example: At MediaWorks, the board uses the EBITDA method to value employee stock. By focusing on earnings, the company ensures that the valuation reflects its current financial health.
Tax implications can be complex for direct stock grants and purchase plans. The value of the stock, minus the purchase price, is often treated as taxable income. This income may be subject to federal taxes, as well as FICA and FUTA taxes. Additionally, non-lapse restrictions, which may be included in the stock plan, can result in tax liabilities when restrictions are lifted.
Example: At BrightHealth, employees receiving direct stock grants must report the difference between the stock’s fair market value and the purchase price as ordinary income. This income is subject to federal taxes and is reported on their W-2 forms.
When designing a direct stock plan, it's essential to include key provisions to ensure clarity and compliance:
Eligibility Requirements: Define which employees are eligible for direct stock grants. Typically, this includes management and key employees.
Example: At Innovatech, only employees who have been with the company for over two years and are in managerial positions are eligible for direct stock grants.
Purchase Timeline: Set a specific timeframe for employees to purchase their stock, typically between 10 to 30 days from the grant date.
Example: At EcoGrow, employees must complete their stock purchase within 15 days of receiving the grant, ensuring timely transactions.
Clawback Provisions: Include policies for reclaiming payouts in case of errors, missed company goals, or employee misconduct.
Example: At FinServe, a clawback provision allows the company to reclaim shares if it is discovered that the employee did not meet performance targets due to data miscalculations.
Direct stock plans often include restrictions to protect the company’s interests:
Non-Competition and Non-Disclosure Agreements: Employees may be required to sign agreements that prevent them from working for competitors or disclosing sensitive information.
Example: At SecureTech, employees who receive direct stock grants must sign a non-competition agreement preventing them from joining a competitor for two years after leaving the company.
First Right of Refusal: The company typically has the first right to buy back shares if an employee decides to sell or leaves the company.
Example: At RetailEdge, if an employee leaves, the company has the first right to repurchase the shares at the original purchase price.
Repurchase Conditions: If an employee leaves before a specified period, the company can repurchase their shares at the initial price paid.
Example: At CloudSync, if an employee leaves within one year of receiving direct stock, the company repurchases the shares to maintain control over ownership.
Issuing stock to employees, either through direct stock grants or direct purchase plans, is an effective way to reward employees and align their interests with the company’s growth. Each method has its benefits and drawbacks, so it’s important to carefully design the plan with input from legal, HR, and the board. Considering tax consequences, valuation, payment options, and necessary restrictions will ensure the plan’s success and compliance.
Real-World Action: If you’re considering issuing stock to your employees, start by consulting with your HR and legal teams to determine eligibility, payment options, and potential tax implications. Draft a clear plan that includes key provisions like purchase timelines and clawback policies to protect both the company and employees.
The biggest question now is, "Do I need a business lawyer?” For most businesses and in most cases, you don't need a lawyer to start your business. Instead, many business owners rely on Legal GPS Pro to help with legal issues.
Legal GPS Pro is your All-In-One Legal Toolkit for Businesses. Developed by top startup attorneys, Pro gives you access to 100+ expertly crafted templates including operating agreements, NDAs, and service agreements, and an interactive platform. All designed to protect your company and set it up for lasting success.
Legal GPS Pro
Protect your business with our complete legal subscription service, designed by top startup attorneys.
100+ legal templates, guides, and expert advice to protect your business.
Trusted by 1000+ businesses
Table of Contents
Let's talk equity compensation! Instead of issuing regular company stock, which can lead to loss of control, complex compliance, and dilution of...
This guide will provide an in-depth understanding of stock options, focusing on two common types—Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) and Non-Qualified...
Restricted stock equity compensation has become increasingly popular among corporations as a way to attract and retain top talent. In this guide, we...